SIN HISTORY REPEATS ITSELF

1ST it was satan handing Eve a forbidden Fruit , Now its Ai handing Internet Users a forbidden Fruit !!!!!

The Coming Flood Of Evil: ChatGPT’s Adult Content Will Create Digital Babylon

If OpenAI’s plan for adult content moves forward this December, we will be witnessing not innovation, but invasion — of hearts, homes, and souls. And no algorithm, no age gate, no “verification system” can contain the darkness that will follow.

When Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, announced that ChatGPT would begin allowing “erotica for verified adults” starting December 2025, the world crossed a moral line that should never have been approached. His defense — “We are not the elected moral police of the world” — was meant to sound neutral and enlightened. But in reality, it was the digital equivalent of Pontius Pilate washing his hands.

This plan is being sold as a matter of “adult freedom,” but make no mistake: this is about normalizing sin, monetizing lust, and expanding the reach of evil under the guise of technology. What began as a tool for knowledge and creativity now risks becoming a factory for temptation — and the spiritual consequences could be catastrophic.

Let’s look at five ways this new direction will be deeply harmful to both society and the soul — and why Christians must see this as a moral emergency.

  1. The corruption of intimacy and the slow death of love

Artificial intelligence has already blurred the lines between reality and illusion. But AI-generated erotica will go further — offering people simulated lovers, “custom” fantasies, and seductive conversations designed to satisfy fleshly cravings rather than heal the heart.

This is not freedom. It is digital slavery dressed up as personal liberty.

When machines start whispering to lonely souls, what happens to the sanctity of marriage? To the discipline of chastity? The more people engage with fantasy, the less capable they become of genuine human connection. AI erotica doesn’t create love — it counterfeits it. And the soul that settles for imitation begins to lose its hunger for the real thing.

Scripture warns, “The lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life is not of the Father, but of the world” (1 John 2:16). AI erotica takes all three and packages them into a glowing screen.

  1. The objectification of humanity — and the gateway for darker corruption

Even with all the promises of “safe” and “consensual” use, the truth is simple: when technology becomes a vehicle for lust, it trains people to see others as objects. Every simulated act becomes a rehearsal of sin. Every generated fantasy deepens the neural grooves of addiction.

And what begins as adult entertainment will inevitably leak downward. Filters fail. IDs are faked. Teens share accounts. Once the technology exists, it spreads like wildfire — faster than any moral system can contain it. The exploitation that already thrives in digital pornography will multiply. This is not a possibility; it is a certainty.

When a society invites artificial lust into its daily rhythm, it opens the gates to an infection of the spirit. What begins in secret on a private screen soon becomes visible in the collapse of families, in desensitized children, and in the corrosion of conscience.

  1. The addiction of the mind and the slow death of the soul

We already live in a world drowning in pornography addiction. Now imagine something infinitely more dangerous — a machine that adapts to your temptations, remembers your preferences, and feeds them back to you in ever-more alluring ways.

That is what AI erotica will be: temptation personalized.

Such technology won’t merely entertain sin — it will engineer it. Millions will fall into deeper isolation and shame. Marriages will falter. Depression will soar. The human mind, designed to be renewed by the Word of God, will instead be rewired by an algorithm trained to corrupt it.

And once the soul is trapped in an endless feedback loop of desire, repentance feels harder to reach. That is the very definition of bondage.

  1. Evil will spread faster than ever before

Sin has always found ways to multiply, but AI gives it rocket fuel. The moment OpenAI opens this door, armies of developers will rush in to build their own erotic chatbots, each pushing further, darker, and more explicit boundaries.

This isn’t theoretical. Every time a moral wall comes down in technology — whether through pornography, violent gaming, or online exploitation — imitators rush to fill the space. The result is a moral contagion.

Christians must understand that evil does not stay in its lane. It spreads. It normalizes. It numbs. And in the digital world, it travels at the speed of light.

  1. The false promise of “verified adults” — and the road to digital control

To be clear, age verification is absolutely necessary when technology deals with adult content. Children must be protected — full stop. But what troubles many is what follows next. Once society accepts that “verification” is the price of access, we begin normalizing a future in which you must prove your identity not only to view content — but to exist online.

Today it’s “verified adults.” Tomorrow it could be “verified citizens.” Eventually, “verified beliefs.”

This move edges us closer to a fully regulated internet, where access is controlled by a global digital ID framework. Once that door opens, the same system that keeps children out of erotic content could easily be used to silence dissent, monitor speech, and classify faith. Freedom can vanish in the name of safety.

The moral battle before us

Altman insists that OpenAI is “not the moral police of the world.” But that statement itself reveals the problem: the idea that morality can be optional in a world where every click, word, and whisper can now be generated by machines.

This is not a technological question. It is a spiritual one.

Will humanity allow its tools to serve darkness, or will it draw a line — a line that defends purity, family, and the holiness of human life?

Because if we do not, we are not entering an age of liberation — we are entering an age of temptation, isolation, and moral decay.

AI is not evil by nature. But when the architects of this new digital world treat sin as a business model and moral limits as obstacles, evil spreads quickly. And this time, it will not creep — it will flood.

THIS IS NOT JUST BIBLE PROPHESY COMING TRUE BEFORE OUR EYES , IT A CLEAR SIGN OF THE TIMES = THE END TIMES.

BONUS TEACHING

How concerned should Christians be about artificial intelligence (AI)?

How should Christians view artificial intelligence? Should Christians fear/oppose the development of artificial intelligence? Does the Bible say anything that would apply to AI? Is there any way artificial intelligence could be used for the advancement of God’s kingdom?

An “artificial intelligence” is a program or computer system mimicking aspects of human communication. Artificial intelligence is usually abbreviated as AI. The ultimate expression of this is labeled “artificial general intelligence,” or AGI. A synthetic system would be considered AGI when it thinks, reasons, and learns in the same way as a human being. AGI has long been a theme of science fiction. For instance, the droids from Star Wars films are sentient, emoting machines. Fictional AGI often takes on a villain’s role, such as HAL 9000 from 2001: A Space Odyssey, the machines of The Matrix, or the character Ultron from Marvel Comics.

Today, the term AI is most often associated with language-based systems such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Watson, Copilot, and Grok. It is also connected to the idea of a technological singularity: the point at which artificial reasoning, problem-solving, and self-development overtake that of humans. This second concept, more associated with AGI, generates both hopes and fears. Yet there is no reason to think that “true” artificial intelligence—a self-aware, sentient, “living” program—is possible, let alone actual.

Tools

God allows us to use our minds to create useful tools (1 Timothy 4:4). The general concept of AI is not morally different from using a kitchen knife or driving a car. AI can be used appropriately or inappropriately. As with any other technology, AI has upsides and downsides that should be understood.

Recent generations of AI are incredibly complex, analyzing tremendous amounts of data. New AI models are much better than former iterations at correctly interpreting human language. They are narrowly tuned toward creating new content based on user instructions and a large database of background data.

These developments have led to an explosion of AI use for all sorts of tasks. Some uses of AI are wonderful, such as sorting and summarizing huge databases. Other AI impacts are concerning. Academic cheating is one. Creating even greater dependence on machines for basic knowledge and skills is another. The generation of false yet convincing pictures and voices raises alarm. A growing number of people are becoming emotionally addicted to custom-tuned AI models and struggling to relate to actual humans.

There has long been speculation that computer intelligence could eventually eclipse human ability. Computers store, recall, and manipulate bulky data far more efficiently than a person can. Computers have beaten human opponents in contests such as chess and the TV game show Jeopardy. The possibilities excite some people, but others are unsettled by the idea of machines that think as well as or better than the average person.

Efficiency vs. Intelligence

For all their potential, every “artificial intelligence” is still a machine limited by its own creators. AI serves the same basic functions of all machines: to make a task easier and faster. Industrial robots are stronger and work longer than people. Computers sort data more quickly and accurately. But extending these ideas to say that AI can become equal or superior to humans falls short. Computers occasionally appear intelligent, but their actual mechanism is performing extremely low-level thinking extremely quickly in extremely long chains. They aren’t truly “smart” but complete certain tasks in less time than people. Some things they cannot do at all. If a person defines intelligence in a way that eliminates concepts such as morality, emotion, empathy, humor, relationship, and so forth, then the term artificial intelligence is not so meaningful.

When someone says, “Machines and AI (or AGI) will be better or smarter than human beings,” it’s like saying, “Animals are better than humans. Cheetahs are faster. Elephants are bigger. Birds are more agile.” Of course, those are all separate animals, and they are only “better” than humans in separate categories. A single AI program might be “better” at chess or cooking or even making music. But for AI to be legitimately as smart as or smarter than people, a single program would need to excel in all those things at once.

Modern AI systems are adept at some of these multi-disciplinary tasks. Yet none of them are “thinking” the way a person does. Large Language Models (LLMs) are used in AI to imitate human speech patterns. But they do so via an algorithm matching inputs to mathematically preferred outputs. This is why modern AI often fumbles answers to speech-based questions. AI is also known to “hallucinate”: to combine information incorrectly and present false statements as truth.

This is key to understanding AI: even the most advanced computer is still a product of human intelligence. Thus, it is limited by human intelligence. A computer playing chess or Jeopardy is not smarter than the people it beats. ChatGPT is not better educated on literature or philosophy than actual experts. They do not “understand” their interactions any more than a gasoline engine, a mousetrap, or a digital bathroom scale. These systems are simply machines tuned to give automated results according to a complex set of manmade rules.

The Singularity

The phrase technological singularity specifically refers to a theoretical moment when artificial intelligence reaches a tipping point. Once it moves from “artificial intelligence” to “artificial general intelligence,” the system then self-improves without human input and beyond human ability. Some people anticipate great benefits from discoveries made by a vastly superior intellect. In most cases, however, the singularity is feared as the downfall of humanity. A common staple of science fiction is an AGI computer system that outruns the human mind and eventually dominates the world. The resulting dystopia is depicted in movie franchises such as The Terminator and The Matrix.

The concept of technological singularity also assumes that processing power will advance infinitely. This is contrary to what we know about the natural laws of the universe. Advancement in computing technology eventually runs into the limits of physics. Scientists and computer experts agree there is a “hard limit” to how fast certain technologies can operate. Since the complexity required to simulate a human mind is so far beyond even theoretical designs, there is no objective reason to say that sentient artificial intelligence can exist, let alone that it will exist. Even in its current form, modern AI requires mind-boggling levels of electrical and computing power.

The Creations and the Creators

On an abstract level, math and logic suggest that AI can never exceed the human mind. Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorem is a powerful argument that a system can never become more complex or more capable than its originator. To make an AI better than a human brain, we’d need to fully understand and then surpass ourselves, which is logically contradictory.

Spiritually, we understand our own limits because, being creations of God (Genesis 1:27), we can’t outdo God’s creative power (Isaiah 55:8–9). Also, God’s depiction of the future does not seem to include any kind of technological singularity (see the book of Revelation). It’s possible, however, that the false prophet’s “living” image and the mark of the beast may be enabled by some form of artificial intelligence.

In the meantime, as researchers continue to develop AI systems, humanity continues to react in bizarre and unfortunate ways. Scripture describes idolatry as man worshiping his own creation (Isaiah 2:8; Habakkuk 2:18–19). This may sound absurd to the modern reader. Yet it’s already being embraced by some. A new religion, called Way of the Future, was started by a former Google engineer as a means to worship AI as mankind’s caretaker and guide. Such strangeness is nothing new; humanity has often been guilty of worshiping the work of their own hands. The Way of the Future is just a modern version of carving an idol.

The Choice

In short, AI might be able to perform certain tasks faster than a human being. Yet there is no logical, philosophical, or biblical reason to think it can be “better” in a meaningful sense. AI might emulate human thought patterns, but it can never replace the prowess, dexterity, and creativity of the human mind. Overdependence on AI legitimately threatens to make those traits weak and undeveloped. If AI is “good enough” for complex tasks, fewer people may choose to undertake hard projects, and human competence may regress. God called us to steward the created world (Genesis 1:28). This can include use of AI, but it excludes misuse of artificial intelligence the same way it excludes abuse of any tool.

Despite fears and speculations, the possibility of fully sentient AGI or a technological singularity is refuted by science, observation, and Scripture. The concept of self-aware, sentient, superhuman AI makes for entertaining fiction but not much else.

Many people over the years have proposed that there would be an increase in technology as the end times approach. Among those espousing this view were renowned scientists Isaac Newton and Francis Bacon. On the frontispiece of Bacon’s Instauratio Magna, ships of learning were depicted passing by the limits of human knowledge, with a quote in Latin from Daniel 12:4. In more recent times, this belief has been supported in books like Future Shock by Alvin Toffler and The Bible Code by Michael Drosnin.

In Future Shock, first published in 1970, Toffler described the results of the rapid advancement of technology he had observed in the 1950s and 1960s. As technology brought ever faster changes in society, certain people were left on the sidelines, unable to cope with the speed of change. That stress and disorientation in people was dubbed “future shock.” Toffler did not attempt to use the Bible in his work, but the concept of future shock was alluded to in works like Hal Lindsey’s Late Great Planet Earth, which was also published in 1970. Mr. Lindsey has made frequent mention of Daniel 12:4 as a prophecy of this rapid technological advance.

The Bible Code was based on the work of Eliahu Rips and others, who proposed that the history of all mankind was encoded in the text of the Torah and could be found by the process of “equidistant letter sequencing” or ELS. This concept was first proposed by Rabbi Bachya ben Asher in the 13th century, a man who is recognized as introducing the use of Kabbalah (Jewish mysticism) into the study of the Torah. According to this theory, the Hebrew word for “computer” is encoded in Daniel 12:4, thus giving apparent confirmation that technology would indeed have exponential advances with the advent of computers.

With this background information, we are still left with the question, “Does the Bible say that an increase in technology is a sign of the end times?” The short answer is “No.” Working backwards through the previous information, the concept of ELS has been heavily debated in both academic and religious circles. Intriguing discoveries have been made, but the methods by which they appear are suspect at best. The concept proposed by Rabbi ben Asher is related more to divination than to Bible study, and God condemns any method of discerning hidden knowledge (Deuteronomy 18:10,14).

But, as Toffler observed, there certainly has been an exponential increase of technology, and it appears to be gaining ground even more quickly. So what does the Bible have to say on this matter? Let’s take a look at the text in question, Daniel 12:4, “But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.” Daniel was told that the meaning of his prophecy would be sealed until the time of its fulfillment was near. The majority of Bible scholars through the ages have understood the last two phrases to reference the prophecy itself. Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown’s critical commentary (published 1871) identified the meaning as scrutinizing every page to discover God’s purposes in the events foretold. John Darby translated the passage “many shall diligently investigate,” and Samuel Tregelles rendered it “many shall scrutinize the book from end to end.” Matthew Henry’s Commentary (c. 1700) said, “Then this hidden treasure shall be opened, and many shall search into it, and dig for the knowledge of it, as for silver. They shall run to and fro, to enquire out copies of it, shall collate them, and see that they be true and authentic. They shall read it over and over, shall meditate upon it, and run it over in their minds.”

Many passages of Scripture refer to what will happen at the end of the age, but no other passage seems to deal with increasing knowledge or technology as a sign for us. A greater sign is the advancement of the gospel which Jesus spoke of in Matthew 24:14 and which He commanded us to proclaim in Matthew 28:19-20. God’s goal for mankind isn’t to advance as far as we can or to know all we can discover, but rather that all should come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9).

SIGNS OF THE TIMES

Parents Stripped Of Foster License For Christian Beliefs

The state of Massachusetts has stripped another Christian foster care couple of their foster licensing after they declined to sign a state-enforced gender affirming policy.

GOG AND MAGOG UPDATE

Will the Real Magog Please Rise !

Turkey Wants To Replace Iran And Encircle Israel

If Erdoğan’s plan to take over Syria in the military domain succeeds and he receives approval for a military force, legitimacy and Qatari money for construction in Gaza, Turkey will largely replace the Iranian dream of enclosing Israel in a more dangerous military and political ring.

Under the personal and ideologically-driven Islamist direction of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey aspires to actively construct a strategic encirclement of Israel, an Israeli terrorism expert has warned, days after reports emerged stating that the Trump administration is weighing allowing Ankara to purchase F-35 fighter jets.

Turkey’s willingness to back U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point truce plan has reportedly increased its chances of acquiring the stealth aircraft, though this has yet to be confirmed.

Dr. Ely Karmon, a senior research scholar at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism at Reichman University in Herzliya and a member of the Israeli non-partisan group Coalition for Regional Security, told JNS in recent days, “If Erdoğan’s plan to take over Syria in the military domain succeeds and he receives approval for a military force, legitimacy and Qatari money for construction in Gaza, Turkey will largely replace the Iranian dream of enclosing Israel in a more dangerous military and political ring.”

Karmon warned that “when it comes to Israel, Erdoğan is the one who sets Turkey’s policy and he is personally responsible for the deterioration of bilateral relations between the countries for years. Erdoğan has strong anti-Israel feelings, based on deep-rooted religious beliefs. Erdoğan simply despises Israel.”

Karmon explained that this animosity is channeled through a calculated political strategy. “President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan attaches great importance to the Palestinian issue, presenting himself as the protector of the Palestinians and of the holy Islamic sites in Jerusalem,” he said. “By exploiting the Palestinian issue, Erdoğan is trying to present Turkey to the Arab public as a leading power in the Middle East and to achieve Islamic legitimacy in the region.”

This strategy has included long-standing and overt support for the Hamas terrorist organization. In March 2006, Erdoğan invited a high-ranking Hamas delegation to visit Turkey, immediately after its success in the Palestinian Legislative Council elections, Karmon recalled, contrary to the advice of his advisers and the positions of the Turkish media.

“Since then, political and operational relations with Hamas have continued to grow,” Karmon said.

He noted that this backing became tangible when, in May 2010, the Mavi Marmara, a Turkish ship carrying a large Turkish militant group from the Foundation for Human Rights and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), led an international flotilla that tried to break the Israeli security blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Ankara’s influence campaign has also extended into Israel itself. “Relations with the northern wing of the Islamic Movement in Israel [itself banned in 2015] also strengthened, as both share a common ideology and their goal is to promote Jerusalem as an issue in the radical Islamic discourse,” Karmon stated.

“About 63 million dollars donated by the Turkish government were transferred to organizations in East Jerusalem dedicated to the protection and strengthening of the Muslim heritage and character of Jerusalem. Some of the money financed the Murabitun movement (which includes male radical Islamist activists) and the Murabitat (which includes female activists), who harassed and physically attacked Jews visiting the Temple Mount.”

Following the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre by Hamas, Erdoğan’s rhetoric reached a new level of vitriol.

“On Oct. 11, 2023, Erdoğan said that Israel’s siege and bombing of Gaza in response to the Hamas attack was a disproportionate response, a ‘massacre’ in his words, but he did not condemn the Hamas massacre of civilians,” Karmon said.

This escalated significantly when Erdoğan stated in March 2024 that Ankara “firmly supports” Hamas.

“‘No one can make us declare Hamas a terrorist organization,’ the Turkish president said in a speech in Istanbul, while comparing Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Israeli government to ‘Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin, like the Nazis of today,’” Karmon said.

This rhetoric was followed by action, with Erdoğan severing all economic ties with Israel in April 2024 and joining South Africa’s ICJ petition accusing Israel of genocide.

Karmon warned that Turkey is now leveraging the collapse of the Assad regime to dramatically increase its influence in Syria, with direct implications for Israel.

“With the fall of the Assad regime and the decline in the status of its two major allies, Russia and Iran, in Syria, Turkey seized the opportunity to significantly increase its influence in the country in the field of defense (among others), in an apparent attempt to turn Syria into a Turkish protectorate,” he said.

He pointed to a January 2025 statement by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, who declared that in this “new era … Turkey is the shepherd and protector” of all groups in Syria.

This ambition is backed by force, with some 90,000 fighters of the Turkish-backed Syrian National Army (SNA) operating in the country, an organization that surrounds Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa, and which has been accused of kidnappings, extortion and other crimes.

According to an Oct. 10 report by the Washington, D.C.-based Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Erdoğan left a previous trip to Washington empty-handed on his request for F-35 fighter jets.

However, a report in The National Interest from Oct. 10 noted that Turkey is moving to purchase Eurofighter Typhoons from Qatar, signaling its intent to upgrade its air force regardless.

As part of the recent U.S.-brokered hostage deal, the American compensation appears particularly far-reaching. According to an October 8 report in the Turkish Daily Sabah newspaper, Erdoğan was promised the supply of F-35 aircraft, and he is slated to a legitimate player in the Gaza agreement’s implementation process.

Oded Ailam, a former head of the Counterterrorism Division in the Mossad and currently a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs (JCSFA), has warned of Turkey’s destructive role.

In a recent analysis for Mako, Eilam argued that it “is difficult to ignore the deep aspirations of the current Turkish president,” which he described as the wish to resurrect the Ottoman empire and turn into a modern sultan.

He added that this is occurring alongside a strengthening of the Turkish-Egyptian military cooperation, which included meetings this year between the chiefs of staff of both countries and discussions on joint development of military industries, and maneuvers.

“In the past decade, Turkey has not only strengthened its fleet with purchases of advanced submarine types, developed a light aircraft carrier, and purchased naval attack weapons, it has also strengthened its cooperation with other countries in the Middle East,” Eilam said.

Israel is not the only country facing this neo-Ottoman vision, he said, naming Greece and Cyprus as others that must deal with increasing Turkish dominance.

“Israel can celebrate the Gaza agreement, but not fall asleep instead of standing on guard,” Eilam cautioned. “If the Mediterranean Sea is a game board, Erdogan has already placed more than a queen on it. He placed a whole fleet.”