Bible Prophecy, Signs of the Times and Gog and Magog Updates with Articles in the News
Satans Playing Field / Canada Is Showing Us The True, Ugly Colors of Euthanasia.
Euthanasia Is Not Mercy!!!
Canada’s so-called Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program isn’t just failing vulnerable people — it’s actively betraying them. Time and again, it delivers fresh, horrifying proof that euthanasia is not compassion, but a moral nightmare dressed as mercy. Yet far too many still look away. Why?
Mrs. B’s Swift and Tragic End
Consider an elderly woman in her 80s — known only as Mrs. B — who endured devastating complications after heart surgery. Sent home for palliative care under her husband’s watch, she initially expressed interest in MAiD. However, during her first formal assessment, she withdrew the request decisively, citing personal and religious convictions. She explicitly chose inpatient hospice or palliative sedation instead — options that honored her desire to live out her final days naturally.
Her husband, crushed by what he called “caregiver burnout” and frustrated by a denied hospice placement, refused to honor her decision. The very next day, he demanded a second assessment. In a horrifying rush, the new assessor dismissed the first practitioner’s explicit warnings: concerns about coercion, the patient’s sudden reversal, and the absence of any true medical emergency. A third virtual approval followed like a rubber stamp. Assessments conducted in her husband’s presence sealed her fate. That same evening, Mrs. B was euthanized — a grotesque, single-day execution against her clearly stated will.
An official Ontario MAiD Death Review Committee report exposed the litany of failures of this case: superficial scrutiny of her vulnerability, blatant disregard for manipulation and viable alternatives, and eroded safeguards that let external pressures extinguish an innocent life. Stripped to its essence, this is the brutal reality: Her husband — however burdened — effectively discarded his wife’s life because he no longer wanted the responsibility. The report itself concluded that the assisted suicide occurred “against her will.”
Kiano Vafaeian, 26: Diabetic, Blind, and Depressed
Now contrast this horror with 26-year-old Kiano Vafaeian, who actively sought MAiD. Battling Type 1 diabetes, blindness in at least one eye, and crushing depression, he was approved once — only to be saved by his mother’s passionate intervention. Margaret Marsilla launched a public campaign, secured mental health resources, and halted the process, granting him precious time to live.
But MAiD’s 2022 expansion to non-terminal chronic conditions reopened the door. Approved again and scheduled to be euthanized that September in Toronto, his mother once more successfully rallied support through petitions and media, even prompting her son’s doctor to withdraw. Years passed. Then, in late 2025, Vafaeian was approved yet again, this time in Vancouver by Dr. Ellen Wiebe, who has carried out over 400 executions by euthanasia. This final green light exploited a loophole, framing his torment as primarily physical (diabetes-related blindness) despite depression’s undeniable dominance. The young man, not even 30 years old, was euthanized on December 30, 2025.
His mother learned of his death only after it was done. Distraught, she decried the system’s failure to involve family or offer alternatives, accusing it of choosing “death over care.”
A Tapestry of Abuse, Manipulation, and Pseudo-Solutions
These are not isolated tragedies. Rather, they are but glimpses of a vast pattern of manipulation, where exhaustion, depression, or despair are met not with healthy support and comfort but with a swift path to death. Proponents frame assisted suicide as liberation — an “easy way out” when life becomes too much. They conveniently ignore that hardships can be overcome, that hope and help do exist. Yet death becomes the pseudo-solution sold as mercy. And tragically, too many accept it.
The pattern poisons even broader corners of society. Canadian actress Claire Brosseau, only 48, has fought manic depression, anxiety, substance abuse, chronic suicidal ideation, and more since childhood. She has appeared in dozens of films, survived multiple suicide attempts, and remains under multiple mental health specialists’ care. Denied MAiD in 2021 — because the program still excludes mental illness alone as a qualifying factor — she joined a lawsuit with Dying With Dignity Canada, claiming exclusion is “discriminatory” and violates her “right to die.”
To this day, her case remains pending. Yet both her psychiatrists insist that she can improve — that they desperately want her to heal. Still, Brosseau feels it has all been “too much,” ready to abandon friends, family, and life itself.
The rot even extends to Canada’s prisons. Since 2018, at least 15 federal inmates have been euthanized via MAiD, with 67 applications overall and numbers climbing. The state now offers death as an “escape” for those already caged — preferring lethal injection over meaningful reform, rehabilitation, or humane care.
Euthanasia Is Not Mercy
When will we finally say, “Enough”?
The question is not whether these deaths — from an elderly woman coerced against her will, to a young man in his 20s whose depression was treatable, to prisoners offered death instead of redemption — constitute mercy. The reality screams otherwise: euthanasia is not compassion, but a perilous gateway to exploitation, coercion, and the erosion of human dignity. It transforms suffering into a justification for state-sanctioned killing, abandoning the vulnerable when they need protection most.
Canada’s MAiD regime reveals a society sliding toward moral collapse — one where death is normalized as a budget-friendly “solution,” where safeguards crumble under pressure and emotion, and where the sanctity of life is traded for convenience. The evidence piles up. The body count rises. The human toll devastates. So, why aren’t we demanding abolition now? Why aren’t we pouring resources into palliative care that comforts, mental health services that heal, disability support that dignifies, prison reform that redeems?
People are not disposable. Every person bears God’s image. We were created to be pursued — first by Him, then by one another. Not abandoned. Not euthanized. Not left alone in our brokenness. Those realities, dear reader, are devastating products of a fallen world. A world where real solutions are sidelined by the expansion of a program that kills the very people it claims to help.
And Canada isn’t the only country fueling this industry of death. Other nations are following close behind. Canada just happens to be full of horrendous stories that show the true, ugly colors of euthanasia. Yet, even in America, at least 11 states have legalized some form of assisted suicide, with 10 others considering similar laws.
This is a fallen world’s cruel counterfeit of compassion, and it’s creeping in slowly, going unnoticed by many. Sin has fractured everything — our bodies, our minds, our relationships, our societies. We’re all guilty before a holy God, deserving judgment for our rebellion. But here is the astonishing good news: God did not abandon us to death.
In His love, He sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to live the perfect life we could not live, to die on the cross bearing the penalty for our sins, and to rise again, conquering death itself. And in Christ, suffering finds meaning, dignity is restored, and eternal life is secured — not through ending life prematurely, but through trusting the One who gives life abundantly.
Real solutions exist. They demand effort, sacrifice, love, and truth. The gospel offers a better way: life, hope, redemption. We can still choose it — for ourselves, for the vulnerable, for our culture. But silence is complicity. The time to act is now, before more image-bearers are discarded in the name of “dignity.” Turn to Christ. Embrace the life only He gives. And fight against a world that seeks to destroy it.
Could Iran shoot chemical weapons at Israel?
Chemical warheads require precise dispersal mechanisms, stable storage conditions, and specialized engineering to survive the extreme heat and pressure of ballistic missile flight.
Iran’s ability to fire chemical weapons at Israel is a question that blends capability, intent, and technical feasibility.
Iran signed the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993 and ratified it in 1997, formally banning the development and use of chemical agents.
Despite this, U.S. intelligence assessments have long stated that Iran retains the industrial capacity, precursor chemicals, and technical expertise needed to restart chemical‑weapons production if it chose to.
Reports from the U.S. State Department and Defense Intelligence Agency note that Iran previously produced mustard gas and nerve agents during the Iran‑Iraq War, giving it historical experience in chemical‑weapons manufacturing.
The more complex issue is whether Iran could deliver such weapons to Israel.
Iran possesses one of the largest and most diverse missile arsenals in the Middle East, including the Shahab‑3, Sejjil, Emad, and Khorramshahr ballistic missiles, all with ranges between 1,000 and 2,000 kilometers—easily enough to reach Israeli territory.
It also fields cruise missiles such as the Soumar and Paveh, which fly at low altitude and could challenge radar detection.
In theory, any of these systems could be modified to carry a chemical payload.
However, delivering chemical agents effectively is far more difficult than attaching them to a missile.
Chemical warheads require precise dispersal mechanisms, stable storage conditions, and specialized engineering to survive the extreme heat and pressure of ballistic missile flight.
Historically, even advanced militaries have struggled to build reliable chemical‑warhead systems, and Iran has never demonstrated such a capability in testing or combat.
Israel, meanwhile, maintains one of the world’s most advanced multi‑layered air‑defense networks.
Arrow‑2 and Arrow‑3 intercept ballistic missiles outside the atmosphere, David’s Sling covers medium‑range threats, and Iron Dome handles rockets, drones, and short‑range fire.
During Iran’s unprecedented direct attack on Israel in April 2024, the Arrow system successfully intercepted multiple ballistic missiles, proving in real combat that Israel can stop high-speed threats long before they reach Israeli airspace.
Theoretically, Iran could attempt to fire chemical‑armed missiles at Israel, but practically, the obstacles are enormous: engineering challenges, international consequences, and Israel’s proven ability to intercept ballistic missiles at long range.
The scenario is not impossible, but it remains highly unlikely—and strategically self-destructive for Iran.
PASTOR DIRK SAYS : WELL THE BIBLE SAYS THEY WILL !
WATCH: Iranian military showcases underground naval base amid threats to US
Iranian state media aired footage of a secret underground naval base packed with thousands of missiles and launchers—a clear warning aimed at the United States and Israel amid looming operations.
600,000 American Jews considering immigrating to Israel
Despite terrorism and threats from Iran, American Jews overwhelmingly believe Israel is the safest place in the world for Jews, with antisemitism fueling rise in interest in immigrating to Israel.
Some 600,000 American Jews are currently considering making Aliyah to Israel, a new poll shows, while another 900,000 say they may consider immigrating to Israel at some point in the future.
On Tuesday, the Jewish People Policy Institute (JPPI) released the results of its latest survey of American Jews, polling Jews in the United States regarding their views on Aliyah, or immigration to Israel.
The survey found that more than two-thirds (68%) of American Jews believe that the State of Israel is the safest place in the world for Jews to live, an increase of 5 points compared to last year, despite fears of a possible war between Israel and Iran.
Orthodox Jews were most likely to say they believe Israel is the safest country in the world for Jews, with 91% agreeing with that claim, while ultra-Orthodox Jews were slightly less likely (78%) than other Orthodox Jews. Reform Jews were least likely to agree with the claim (62%), followed by unaffiliated Jews (64%) and Conservative Jews (74%).
Of the estimated 7.5 million Jews living in the United States – according to a 2021 JPPI report – 8%, or 600,000 people, are currently considering making Aliyah to Israel.
While only a minority of respondents indicated they are likely to consider moving to Israel, the vast majority said they would contemplate the move under certain circumstances.
Twelve percent said they might consider moving to Israel at some point in the future, while 35% said they would consider it “under certain circumstances,” with a further 27% saying they would consider it under “extreme circumstances.” Just 13% said they would never contemplate moving to Israel.
Orthodox Jews were far more likely than others to say they are currently considering moving to Israel.
More than one-third (36%) of ultra-Orthodox Jews are currently considering immigrating to Israel, compared to 18% of Orthodox respondents.
Forty percent of American Jews say that antisemitism is the primary reason they would consider Aliyah, a similar figure to polls of Canadian and British Jews.
The vast majority of Jews in the United States (84%), Canada (88%), and Britain (77%) said they had personal connections to someone who immigrated to Israel.
“The findings of the Jewish Peoplehood Index show that Israel, the nation-state of the Jewish people, is perceived by most Jews worldwide as the safest place for Jews,” said JPPI Director-General Dr. Shuki Friedman.
“Rising antisemitism strengthens the connection to Israel and thoughts about Aliyah, and personal networks—family, friends, and community—are the main drivers shaping Aliyah consciousness.”
“The fact that nearly every Jew personally knows someone who has made Aliyah and is satisfied with the move underscores the depth of the connection to Israel and the potential inherent in it. For the Israeli government, this represents a strategic opportunity: there is broad potential for Aliyah from the United States and other affluent countries, awaiting the right circumstances.”
PASTOR DIRK SAYS – IS THIS NEWS NOT BIBLE PROPHECY ?
Iran threatens to sink US nuclear carrier as it reaches Mideast
Expert warns American supercarrier deployed to the Persian Gulf could be vulnerable to a swarm attack of Iranian suicide drones as Tehran threatens attack on USS Abraham Lincoln.
The Iranian government threatened over the weekend to sink an American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier deployed to the Middle East in response to Iran’s mass killings of protesters.
Iran’s Islamic Ideology Dissemination Organization published a video featuring AI-generated images of an American supercarrier under attack by Iranian forces.
The video details how a concerted attack on a carrier could overwhelm its impressive defensive systems, including the Phalanx close-in weapon system – a high-powered ship-mounted Gatling gun capable of destroying incoming aircraft and missiles.
In the nearly two-minute video, the Iranian IDO claims that a volley of Iran’s Fattah ballistic missiles could overcome a carrier’s defenses, with a direct hit capable of destroying the ship.
The propaganda video closes with AI footage of an American carrier split in half by a ballistic missile before sinking.
Iran released the video shortly before the USS Abraham Lincoln and its battle group arrived in the region Sunday night.
The Nimitz-class supercarrier, supported by three destroyers, was ordered to leave the Pacific last week, as part of the US military’s broader buildup of forces in the Middle East.
While the multibillion-dollar, 116,000-ton supercarrier has extensive defenses – including nine fixed-wing aircraft and helicopter squadrons, along with its support group – some experts say it could be vulnerable to a mass attack by Iranian missiles or drones.
Cameron Chell, CEO of Draganfly, told Fox News that small drone aircraft could swarm a large vessel like the USS Lincoln and pose a “credible threat.”
“If hundreds are launched in a short period of time, some are almost certain to get through,” Chell said.
PASTOR DIRK SAYS – THIS IN BIBLE PROPHECY VERY CLEAR