False Peace Coming: The Hidden Dangers In Trump’s 21 Point Gaza Roadmap
Israel stands at the edge of history. Once again, the world demands that she compromise her security for the sake of illusions, offering promises of peace that have no firm foundation. Ironically, President Trump – one of Israel’s most vocal friends and defenders – is leading the push for this plan, making it even harder for Israel to reject.
On the sideline of the U.N. General Assembly this month, Trump and his special envoy Steve Witkoff shared a preliminary version of the 21-point framework with key Arab and Muslim nations. Trump has spoken optimistically of its reception — he told reporters that “intense negotiations have been going on for four days and will continue as long as necessary” and claimed he has received a “very good response” from Israel and Arab leaders.
Netanyahu has engaged cautiously, affirming that the release of hostages and dismantling of Hamas must be top priorities, but expressing deep reservations over any role for the Palestinian Authority in Gaza or “giving a terror state” to Palestinians near Jerusalem.
At the U.N., Netanyahu delivered a stirring address denouncing the concept of “recognizing Palestinian statehood near Jerusalem” as tantamount to giving Al Qaeda a foothold near New York City — “sheer madness,” he said.
That metaphor — comparing a post-October 7 Palestinian state to Al Qaeda obtaining a state within striking distance of New York — captures the core Israel concern: what assurances can one truly offer that a new Palestinian regime will not morph back into a terror conduit? Netanyahu argued that to grant statehood to Palestinians so close to Jerusalem now is like allowing 9/11 terrorists not only to survive, but to govern.
Israel stands at the edge of history. Once again, the world demands that she compromise her security for the sake of illusions, offering promises of peace that have no firm foundation. Ironically, President Trump–one of Israel’s most vocal friends and defenders–is leading the push for this plan, making it even harder for Israel to reject.
Advisors like Steve Witkoff and others likely shaped its contours, but Trump views it as another opportunity to secure lasting peace. Yet hope must be tempered by reality: the plan, while well-intentioned, risks ignoring the deep-rooted conflicts and mistrust that have fueled generations of violence. Without addressing these underlying issues, any temporary gains will be fleeting, leaving Israel to shoulder the consequences of a peace built more on optimism than on strategy.
The Problem with the Two-State Vision
The most dangerous thread running through this plan is the proposal to lay the groundwork for a Palestinian state once Gaza is “redeveloped” and the Palestinian Authority is “reformed.” That is political fantasy. Every attempt to create a two-state solution has collapsed because Palestinian leadership rejects Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish state.
Handing Palestinians sovereignty in Gaza — one mile from Jerusalem — would not bring coexistence. It would create a terror base within striking distance of Israel’s heartland. While the US has been the one of the few nations to stand against recognizing a ‘Palestinian State”, this plan signals that even the U.S. may eventually pressure Israel to contravene Scripture and divide the land promised to her.
Below is a direct rebuttal to the dangerous ideas embedded in this new “vision.” These 21 counterpoints expose the flaws and highlight what must truly be done if Israel is to survive in a world determined to erase her.
Rebuttal to Each of the 21 Points
1. “Gaza will be a de-radicalized, terror-free zone that does not pose a threat to its neighbors.”
Without an ironclad enforcement mechanism, this is wishful thinking. Every ceasefire promise in the past has been broken by Hamas or Islamic Jihad. Moreover, “terror-free” cannot be verified without permanent Israeli boots on the ground or at minimum full intelligence oversight. Otherwise, this clause simply resets the clock to the next war.
2. “Gaza will be redeveloped for the benefit of its people.”
Reconstruction sounds noble, but international aid has been repeatedly funneled into weapons stockpiles and tunnels. Redevelopment without direct Israeli auditing authority risks fueling another military buildup. Worse, the international community often prioritizes symbolic projects over security realities, creating photo-ops while ignoring Israel’s safety.
3. “If Israel and Hamas agree … the IDF halts operations and withdraws from the Strip.”
This clause effectively saves Hamas from destruction by freezing the war in its favor. Without complete disarmament first, withdrawal simply hands Hamas time and space to rebuild. It conditions Israel’s retreat on promises rather than performance — a suicidal sequencing.
4. “Within 48 hours … all hostages will be returned.”
This timeline is unrealistic and unenforceable. Hamas thrives on delay tactics and psychological warfare. If Israel halts fire in blind trust, Hamas can manipulate the situation while regaining strategic initiative underground.
5. “Israel will free several hundred Palestinian security prisoners and over 1,000 Gazans arrested since the start of the war.”
This is mass amnesty for terrorists. It rewards violence, dishonors Israeli victims, and guarantees that released killers will return to the battlefield. Trading hostages for criminals creates perverse incentives for future kidnappings.
6. “Hamas members who commit to peaceful coexistence will be granted amnesty.”
Terrorists declaring “peaceful coexistence” on paper means nothing. Amnesty without prosecution ensures impunity. Even worse, this legitimizes Hamas as a political partner instead of prosecuting them as war criminals.
7. “Aid will surge into the Strip … along with the rehabilitation of infrastructure.”
Unmonitored aid equals renewed terror tunnels. Israel must control every truck, every dollar, every ton of cement. Anything less is national suicide.
8. “Aid will be distributed … by the UN and Red Crescent.”
Both organizations have long histories of bias and complicity in Palestinian propaganda. Excluding Israeli oversight not only weakens accountability but effectively sidelines the very nation that has most at stake.
9. “Gaza will be administered by a temporary government of Palestinian technocrats supervised by a new international body.”
This opens the door for Hamas sympathizers disguised as “technocrats.” International bodies are notoriously ineffective at vetting such figures. Worse, the plan signals eventual Palestinian Authority involvement — a direct violation of Israel’s red lines.
10. “An economic plan will be created … to attract investment and create jobs.”
Economic stimulus does not neutralize jihadist ideology. Billions have already been poured into Gaza with little to show beyond rockets and martyrdom culture. Without ideological reform, investment is throwing good money after bad.
11. “An economic zone will be established, with reduced tariffs.”
A low-tariff zone in Gaza risks becoming a hub for smuggling and dual-use goods. If Egypt and Israel don’t control this zone, it becomes a black market feeding Hamas’s war machine.
12. “No one will be forced to leave Gaza … Gazans will be encouraged to remain.”
This forecloses Israel’s ability to establish defensive buffer zones. It also ignores the potential for Jewish resettlement in Gaza — something that could fundamentally alter the security balance. Meanwhile, the right of return remains a lurking demand behind such language.
13. “Hamas will have no role in governance … no military infrastructure.”
Without full Israeli inspection powers, this is fantasy. Hamas can govern through proxies and keep underground networks alive. Paper promises of exclusion are meaningless.
14. “A security guarantee will be provided by regional partners.”
No Arab partner has the will or ability to risk its own stability for Israel’s security. Guarantees from Egypt, Jordan, or Saudi Arabia are only as good as the next political crisis.
15. “A temporary international stabilization force will deploy in Gaza … train a Palestinian police force.”
This would create another “Lebanon scenario” — weak international peacekeepers unable to confront terrorists, and a Palestinian “police” force that eventually turns its guns on Israel.
16. “Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza.”
This clause strips Israel of a legitimate strategic option. Annexation may, in fact, be the only way to permanently eliminate terror infrastructure and assert lasting sovereignty. Forcing Israel to renounce this option undermines deterrence.
Why annexation could be the wiser path: Israel once withdrew from Gaza in the name of peace, only to be repaid with rockets, tunnels, and massacres. Annexation — with full military control and Jewish resettlement — would prevent Gaza from being a perpetual terror incubator. It would restore Israeli sovereignty, deter foreign meddling, and create defensive depth around Israel’s heartland. History has shown that vacuums in Gaza breed jihad; only permanent Israeli presence can break the cycle.
17. “If Hamas delays or rejects … the IDF will hand over terror-free areas to the stabilization force.”
This allows for partial concessions even if Hamas remains defiant. Israel could be forced to retreat from secure zones while Hamas remains operational elsewhere. This rewards Hamas for rejecting peace.
18. “Israel agrees not to carry out future strikes in Qatar.”
Qatar is a key Hamas funder and propaganda hub. To forbid Israel from striking Hamas assets there ties Israel’s hands and grants Qatar immunity as a terror sponsor.
19. “A process will be established to de-radicalize the population, including interfaith dialogue.”
“Dialogue” without accountability is empty rhetoric. Radical imams will hijack the process, and children will continue to be indoctrinated in martyrdom culture. Israel must demand education reform, not vague interfaith slogans.
20. “When redevelopment and PA reform are advanced, conditions may be in place for Palestinian statehood.”
This is the poisoned seed in the plan. Every concession pushes Israel closer to forced recognition of a terror state. Conditioning peace on eventual statehood is the oldest trap in the book.
21. “The U.S. will establish dialogue … for peaceful coexistence.”
Endless “dialogues” only serve Palestinian maximalist demands. Each round of talks chips away at Israel’s legitimacy while rewarding Palestinian intransigence. Dialogue without recognition of Israel as the Jewish state is nothing but diplomatic theater.
Pastor Dirk Says : Trump is the John the Baptist to the Antichrist aka the Jewish Messiah . This Trump / Kushner Peace Plan is Part of the original plan of the Abrahamic Accord. Both Side may not accept this plan and it will Lead to the Final Bomb of the Gog and Magog Battle SOON.
Is Trump’s ‘Board Of Peace’ A Foreshadowing Of Daniel’s End-Times Covenant?
President Donald Trump’s dramatic announcement of a Gaza peace plan-complete with a “Board of Peace” he himself would chair, joined by figures such as Sir Tony Blair-has sent shockwaves through diplomatic circles. For those who study biblical prophecy-especially the visions of Daniel and the Revelation of John-this development is more than politics. It may be a foreshadowing of events foretold long ago.
The Strange Convergence: Military Secrecy And Prophetic Watching
Something unusual is happening in Washington, and while we must resist the urge to leap into wild conspiracy theories, it would be foolish to shrug it off as if nothing were out of the ordinary. Hundreds of America’s top generals are preparing to meet in secret while reports of unusual air tanker movement last seen during the attack on Iran are happening.
Netanyahu accepts Trump’s ceasefire and hostage plan, says it achieves Israel’s war aims Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Donald Trump at press conference,
U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared together at the White House on Monday to unveil a comprehensive ceasefire and postwar Gaza plan that would release all the remaining hostages within 72 hours, pending approval by Hamas.
Trump said Netanyahu had agreed to the plan, which he described as “an extremely fair proposal.”
Standing beside the Israeli leader, the president said the initiative would require Hamas to disarm and release all hostages in exchange for an end to the fighting.
“If accepted by Hamas, all of the hostages, living and dead, would be released almost immediately,” he said, adding that he was “hearing that Hamas wants to get this done.”
The president said the deal would rely on support from Arab countries and could serve as a foundation for longterm stability.
Pastor Dirk Says : Netanyahu is the Last Shepherd of Israel , all this will lead to the Coming of the Jewish Messiah aka the Antichrist. The Jewish Messiah is not Jesus!
Signs of the Times
2025 State Of Theology Survey – Christians Lacking In Firm Grasp Of Essentials
A new study commissioned by Ligonier Ministries in conjunction with Lifeway Research suggests troubling inconsistencies in the beliefs of many self-described evangelicals regarding the Bible, other religions, God’s nature, and human nature.
Pastor Dirk says : The Survey Just shows the real State of the Church . Unto 5 Doctrines of Demons are preached from One Pulpit . some contradicting the Other.
The Silence Of Selective Outrage – Christian Persecution Ignored By Mainstream
While every casualty in Gaza generates international headlines, emergency UN sessions, and passionate campus protests complete with tent encampments and calls for divestment, the systematic extermination of African Christians – occurring on a scale that objectively dwarfs the Gaza conflict – barely registers in mainstream discourse.
Pastor Dirk Says . We need to Understand where this is coming from ! Nigerians are known as scammers and False Dealing and Wheeling , and this in the Churches even More . Now some Real True Believers are picking the Fruits of a Fedup Nation.
A Surge In The Sanctuary: Is “The Charlie Kirk Effect” Real?
Something is stirring in America. Against the backdrop of cynicism, violence, and cultural collapse, a new movement is taking root–one that many are beginning to call “The Charlie Kirk Effect.” Some leaders have estimated church attendance has climbed by as much as 15% since Charlie Kirk’s assassination, many of them young people.
Pastor Dirk Says : Charlie Kirk and His Christian Zionism Doctrine of Demons cannot get all the Credit , Its Shared with the September Rapture Scam of the Pre Tribulation Rapture Doctrine of Demons. 15 % Church Attendance in the Falling Away of the Church YES.
Gog and Magog Update
WATCH: IDF forces dismantle booby-trapped building in Gaza City
IDF forces uncovered and neutralized a bomb hidden on the sixth floor of a Gaza City building, located additional weapons and explosives, and completed the operations without casualties.