Digital Health Advancements Creating Trojan Horse To Digital ID?
Though the Digital Health Ecosystem has the intention of streamlining health care, it could shape up to be a globally harmonized tracking mechanism that plays right into the U.N. and WEF’s plan. It could eventually mandate a digital ID to buy, sell, travel, pay taxes, or participate in the national or global public square. In the wrong hands, it’s the book of Revelation in real time.
In less than a year, the Trump administration has made great strides to untether the United States from globalist chains (such as withdrawing from the World Health Organization) and return to upholding foundational constitutional freedoms. But now, a Big Tech-backed, Trump-approved digital personal health tracking system has appeared on the national landscape with a “Patient-Centric Healthcare Ecosystem” announced at a recent White House event hosted with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Though this public-private initiative promises to “kill the clipboard” and streamline health care services for Americans, it threatens Americans’ privacy and is a step closer to a dystopian centralized tracking system. While the proposed health tracking system plan to be rolled out in the first quarter of 2026 will be optional, it implements a digital prototype that could certainly be expanded or made mandatory in the future.
This government-initiated Digital Health Ecosystem will work with Amazon, Anthropic, Apple, Google, Microsoft, OpenAI, Oracle, and others, including World Economic Forum (WEF) partners who are working with global elites to build sugar-coated, white-labeled Chinese credit system-esque frameworks worldwide.
A Network of Global Giants
For better or worse, the geopolitical, business, economic, and social landscapes are being transformed by a brilliantly marketed global plan labeled “multilateralism.” On the surface, multilateralism promotes global cooperation, convenience, and connectivity, especially when global emergencies arise.
A closer look reveals a network of global giants — the United Nations, World Economic Forum, World Bank Group, Fortune 500 companies, “shadow industries” (lesser-known businesses or enterprises implementing the same agenda), technocrats, and various government leaders — collaborating to create a global infrastructure and digital framework.
This sets the foundation for a global surveillance state that would allow globalist elites to force a tyrannical “digital gulag” upon the world.
Could the seemingly benign, supposedly HIPAA-compliant Digital Health Ecosystem be one of the wolves in sheep’s clothing inching the world closer to implementing a track-and-trace global surveillance state?
A National Forerunner of a Global Blueprint
As the Trump administration navigates this global technology revolution and seeks to empower Americans, the dangerous elements of this “new world” must be resisted, and strategies must be enacted to shield humanity from future despots.
Though the Digital Health Ecosystem has the intention of streamlining health care and riding the wave of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” it could shape up to be a globally harmonized health grid and tracking mechanism that plays right into the U.N. and WEF’s plan. The Digital Health Ecosystem could eventually mandate a digital ID to buy, sell, travel, pay taxes, or participate in the national or global public square. In the wrong hands, it’s the book of Revelation in real time.
In a New American article, writer Veronika Kyrylenko expressed concerns about this “sweeping new vision for American healthcare” and connected the global dots for the American people. She wrote:
“Though branded as a domestic initiative integral to the mission of Making America Healthy Again (MAHA), the U.S. Digital Health Ecosystem mirrors plans already circulating on the world stage.
“The UN’s Global Strategy on Digital Health (2020-2025) promotes universal digital IDs, biometric records, and interoperable networks as the foundation of resilient healthcare. It ties this architecture to the Sustainable Development Goals and World Health Organization objectives.
“The World Economic Forum’s Digital Healthcare Transformation framework similarly promotes AI diagnostics, centralized data exchanges, and cross-border sharing of health records — managed by public-private consortia.”
When Spreading The Gospel Becomes A Crime – How Do We Respond?
The Christian worldview begins with the truth that all people-whether in London, São Paulo, or the remotest jungle-are created in the image of God, but separated from Him by sin. Secularism views every culture as morally neutral, equally valid, and untouchable. In their eyes, it is “imposing” Western religion to share the gospel with different people groups.
“It’s a familiar pattern,” wrote Ruby Conway in The Times. “I download the dating apps again; I swipe half-heartedly, I trepidatiously go on a date. It’s a process detached from real desire, my hand guided by that of external pressure.” No, Conway is not simply expressing her vexations with the modern dating landscape. She’s addressing hook-up culture and how she, and apparently a notable percentage of Generation Z, are leaving it behind.
As great as this sounds at the onset, in reality, it’s not necessarily worth celebration. Mostly — if not entirely — because the reasons for this withdrawal from hook-up culture are far less about swapping a bad lifestyle for a good one. Rather, as Conway herself conveys, it’s about “dating app fatigue,” societal pressures, and lousy men leading to exhaustion and disillusionment.
Signs of the Times
When Spreading The Gospel Becomes A Crime – How Do We Respond?
The Christian worldview begins with the truth that all people-whether in London, São Paulo, or the remotest jungle-are created in the image of God, but separated from Him by sin. Secularism views every culture as morally neutral, equally valid, and untouchable. In their eyes, it is “imposing” Western religion to share the gospel with different people groups.
The Guardian recently published a sensationally worded article with the headline, “Missionaries using secret audio devices to evangelize Brazil’s isolated peoples.” The subtitle sounded equally ominous: “Solar-powered units reciting biblical passages have appeared in the Javari valley, despite strict laws protecting Indigenous groups.”
One would think, from the tone, that the world’s last untouched civilization had been subjected to some dangerous biochemical weapon. In reality, these “secret devices” are nothing more than small, solar-powered radios loaded with Bible passages and gospel presentations–tools that have been used for decades by missionaries to reach those in remote corners of the globe.
Christian ministries often distribute such devices in places where entering physically is difficult or even impossible. They can contain audio Scriptures in local or trade languages, allowing someone who has never seen a Bible or met a Christian to hear about Jesus for the very first time. Yet to those with a secular–and, frankly, anti-God–worldview, even the idea of an Indigenous person hearing the gospel is a threat.
The Guardian quotes Brazilian officials calling these efforts “stealthy” and “under the radar.” The nation’s policy, in place since 1987, forbids evangelism among certain tribes unless the Indigenous group initiates contact. In other words, the Brazilian government has granted itself the authority to decide whether a soul gets the chance to hear about Christ. And some officials even boast that the new “sophisticated” methods are “almost impossible to combat.”
From a purely biblical standpoint, this is nothing new. Governments and rulers have been trying to silence the gospel for 2,000 years. In Acts 4, the apostles Peter and John were arrested for preaching about the resurrection of Jesus. The religious leaders commanded them to stop. Their reply was simple and unflinching: “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard.”
This is the heartbeat of Christian mission work. We are called to obey authorities–but only so long as those authorities do not demand we disobey God. And Christ’s command is crystal clear: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations…” (Matthew 28:19). The command does not exclude dangerous regions, hostile governments, or tribes “known for their deadly expertise with war clubs.” It includes them.
Here lies the worldview divide. Secularism views every culture as morally neutral, equally valid, and untouchable. In their eyes, it is “imposing” Western religion to share the gospel with a people group, even if that group remains in spiritual darkness, bound by fear of evil spirits, tribal warfare, or generational cycles of violence. Better, they say, to leave them alone–forever.
The Christian worldview begins with the truth that all people–whether in London, São Paulo, or the remotest jungle–are created in the image of God, but separated from Him by sin. That separation carries eternal consequences. If we truly believe that Christ is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6), then it would be the height of cruelty not to share the good news.
This is not cultural imperialism. It is not Westernization. It is love–love enough to take risks, to endure government opposition, and to face possible death to tell someone about the Savior who died for them. When Paul wrote that “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” (1 Timothy 1:15), he did not add, “except for the ones behind government borders.”
The Guardian’s article frames this missionary work as covert, almost sinister. But Christians understand it as obedience. Solar-powered Scripture players are not weapons–they are lifelines. They bring hope into places where there is no hospital, no school, and no written word. They speak of a God who entered human history to rescue us, even at the cost of His own life.
History shows us that the gospel is unstoppable. From the underground church in China to the house churches of Iran, believers have found ways to proclaim Christ despite every effort to silence them. If missionaries are now using discreet technology to reach the unreached in Brazil, they are simply carrying on the same mission the apostles began two millennia ago.
And so the choice remains for every Christian: will we let earthly powers determine who can hear the gospel? Or will we stand with Peter and John and say, “We cannot but speak of what we have seen and heard”?
No government decree, no hostile policy, and no physical isolation can erase the reality that Jesus is King of kings and Lord of lords. The Great Commission is not a suggestion–it is a command. And until every tribe and tongue has heard, faithful believers will find a way to speak His name… whether the world approves or not.
Gog and Magog Update
[WATCH] Marco Rubio Has Finally Had Enough With European Leaders After Backing Hamas!
Western leaders’ moves to recognize a Palestinian state may have derailed hostage talks and emboldened Hamas, says U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Olly Anisfeld unpacks the charge, highlights allies standing with Israel, and reveals the deep roots of Arab antisemitism predating Israel’s founding.